In case you’ve missed this one, an interesting analysis was recently published in Nature on citations of manuscripts published in predatory journal. If you contrast
A rare post in French on a conference I gave last year on the status of author taken by students, mainly in the context of
I love science. I hate supposition, superstition, exaggeration and falsified data. Show me the research, show me the results, show me the conclusions – and
Science has a culture that is inherently cautious and that is normally not a bad thing. You could even say conservative, because of the peer
I do not know about you, but I am getting tired and even a bit frustrated by all the e-mails asking me to come to
Beall’s list of predatory journals has found a “commercial” replacement. Let’s see how much it will cost to access. Source: U.S. company launches a new
Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal – The Washington Post.
For the young (and not so young) scientists, a very interesting interview from earlier on this year with the 2002 Physiology / Medicine Nobel Winner